Non-technical
summary: To, Burgmann, and Pollitz (2004) studied
possible triggering mechanisms of the 2001 magnitude M7.7
Bhuj earthquake in northwest India. This earthquake is one
of the very few strong earthquakes in historical times to
have occurred in an intra-plate region far from known major
tectonic plate boundaries. In this part of India, however,
there had been a previous large earthquake, the M7.7 1819
Rann of Kachchh earthquake. One of the questions To et
al., (2004) attempted to answer was whether the 1819
earthquake may have influenced the later occurrence of the
2001 Bhuj earthquake through the process of stress transfer.
The
main contributors to stress transfer that To et al., (2004)
examined was static coseismic deformation and transient postseismic
relaxation of the ductile rock deep below the earthquake rupture.
Their conclusion is that the combined coseismic and postseismic
deformation from the magnitude 7.7 1819 earthquake added stress
and encouraged subsequent failure on the 2001 Bhuj rupture
fault plane. Notably, postseismic stress changes at the location
of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake exceed coseismic stress changes
by around a factor of 4 to 7, emphasizing the role of relaxation
process at substantial distance from the causative fault.
(For comparison, the Rann of Kachchh and Bhuj rupture zones
are
about twice as far apart as the epicentral zones of the M6.5
2003 San Simeon and M6.0 Parkfield, California earthquakes,
which are predicted to have had a similar level of stress transfer
between them.) The 2001 Bhuj earthquake will, in turn, lead
to comparable regional stress perturbations in the Rann of
Kachchh region and might result in continued enhanced earthquake
activity in an extended earthquake sequence in an otherwise
low strain rate, intra-plate setting. |